| Integrated Pest Management
and the Idaho/Eastern Oregon Onion Industry -- Results of Grower Surveys |
Project BDK810
E. J. Bechinski
Extension IPM Coordinator
Division of Entomology
University of Idaho
Moscow, ID 83844
208/885-5972
mailto:ed_bechinski@uidaho.edu |
|
| INTRODUCTION |
| We assessed pest concerns and
use of IPM practices within the onion industry by conducting a regional
survey of commercial (non-seed) dry onion growers in southwest Idaho
and eastern Oregon during winter 1997-1998. Our objectives were two-fold:
|
- to identify grower perceptions of key
pest problems in onions;
- to measure use of pest control tactics
by commercial onion producers, especially use of pesticides and
their alternatives.
|
| The survey was part of a continuing
effort by the University of Idaho Extension IPM Program to document
use of pest management methods by key agricultural industries. |
| Five University of Idaho faculty
contributed to survey questionnaire design. The questionnaire was
mailed during January 1998 to 402 persons on mailing lists provided
by Lynn Jensen (OSU Malheur County Cooperative Extension) and Darrell
Bolz (UI Canyon County Cooperative Extension). Follow-up postcard
reminders were mailed to persons who did not return completed questionnaires
with 2-3 weeks of the initial mailing. Persons who did not respond
to the postcard reminder received a second copy of the questionnaire
4 weeks later. Results here summarize 102 completed, usable surveys. |
PART 1. DEMOGRAPHICS OF SURVEY
RESPONDENTS
|
- The typical survey respondent farmed
approximately 625 acres annually. Average yearly onion production
was 50+ acres, virtually all of which was grown under furrow irrigation.
On average, survey respondents were middle-aged, well-educated,
and reported gross farm sales in the $250,000 to $500,000+ range
during 1997. Respondents were evenly represented from Oregon and
Idaho (TABLE 1).
|
- To the extent these respondents represent
the "typical" commercial onion grower, survey data here can be
interpreted as a snapshot of regional onion production.
|
|
Table 1. Demographic characteristics
of onion growers participating in the
survey.
| Annual Total Acres
Farmed |
|
| average |
623 acres |
| minimum |
35 acres |
| maximum |
15,100
acres |
| Onion Acres Planted |
% growers |
| less
than 10 acres |
0% |
| 10 to
25 acres |
11% |
| 25 to
50 acres |
26% |
| more
than 50 acres |
63% |
| County of onion
production |
% growers |
| Ada |
0% |
| Canyon |
23% |
| Gem |
0% |
| Malheur |
48% |
| Owyhee |
4% |
| Washington |
17% |
| other
counties |
8% |
| Type of Irrigation |
% growers |
| sprinkler |
1% |
| furrow |
99% |
| Grower Age |
|
|
average rank |
3.1
where 1=35 years
old or younger
2=35 to 45 years old
3=46 to 55 years old
4=56 to 65 years old
5=over 65 years old |
| Grower Education |
|
|
average rank |
3.8
where 1=less
than high school
2=high school graduate or GED
3=post high school or vocational
training
4=some college
5=college graduate
6=graduate school |
| Grower Gross Farm
Sales, 1997 |
|
|
average rank |
4.2
where 1=less
than $49,999
2=$50,000 to $99,999
3=$100,000 to $249,000
4=$250,000 to $499,999
5=more than $500,000 |
| *sample size = 402 survey questionnaires mailed, 102 growers
responding (25.4% usable surveys) |
|
| PART 2. GROWER PERCEPTIONS
OF ONION PEST PROBLEMS |
- Growers said that insects are their
most important pest problem in dry onion production. More than
half the respondents ranked insect pests as "serious" problems;
no grower ranked insects as "not a problem" (TABLE 2).
|
- Onion growers perceive diseases,
nematodes and weeds as important but slightly less serious
pests than insects (TABLE 2); more than 4 in 10 survey
respondents ranked these as "serious" problems. A higher percentage
(12%) said diseases and nematodes were "not a problem," compared
to 2% who said weeds were "not a problem."
|
- Nearly 9 in 10 onion producers said
that rodents are not problems in dry onion production
(TABLE 2). No grower said that rodents were serious problems.
|
|
Table 2. Pest concerns
(% growers responding)
| PEST |
"Not
a
problem" |
"Moderate
problem" |
"Serious
problem" |
"Unsure" |
| diseases
& nematodes |
12% |
46% |
43% |
0% |
| weeds |
2% |
55% |
43% |
0% |
| insects |
0% |
45% |
55% |
0% |
| rodents |
88% |
11% |
0% |
1% |
|
- Growers reported their 3 most important
pest problems were thrips, annual broadleaf weeds and yellow nutsedge
(TABLE 3); more than half of survey respondents ranked
these as "serious."
|
|
Table 3. Individual pest
concerns
(% growers ranking pests as
"serious")
| WEEDS |
|
| annual
broadleaves |
55% |
| yellow
nutsedge |
55% |
| annual
grasses |
19% |
| perennial
broadleaves |
19% |
| herbicide-resistant
weeds |
5% |
| INSECTS |
|
| thrips |
69% |
| wireworms |
3% |
| bulb
mite |
2% |
| onion
maggot |
2% |
| DISEASES |
|
| downy
mildew |
34% |
| neck
rot |
33% |
| storage
rots |
33% |
| pink
root |
27% |
| plate
rot (butt rot) |
20% |
|
- Growers generally perceive more individual
diseases and weeds as serious problems than individual insects
pests. Each disease on the survey questionnaire was ranked by
at least 20% of growers as a "serious" problem; most weed problems
similarly were ranked as serious by growers (TABLE 3).
|
|
|
| PART 3A. IPM PRACTICES -- alternatives
to pesticides |
- Essentially all commercial dry onion
growers practice certain elements of Integrated Pest Management.
Multiple pest control tactics are the norm.
|
- "Good farming" cultural practices are
widely used to control onion pests (TABLE 4). Nine of 10
onion producers reduce buildup of diseases, nematodes, weeds and
insects on more than half their onion acreage by rotating fields
out of onions, by cultivating, by destroying cull onions and plant
debris after harvest, and by minimizing bulb injury during weeding
and harvest. Nearly 75% of growers follow a four-year rotation
(onions every 4th year or longer) on at least half their acreage.
|
- Use of biological controls is limited
to modest adoption levels of field scouting for beneficial natural
enemies and use of reduced insecticide application rates to reduce
harm to beneficial biocontrol agents (TABLE 4). "Biologically-intensive"
IPM methods with particularly low levels of use by growers are
as follows:
|
| Biocontrol tactic |
% growers who NEVER use tactic
|
plant border crops
as habitat for ladybeetles
& other beneficial natural enemies |
97% |
| mass-release natural
enemies |
93% |
| scout fields for
natural enemies |
73% |
| reduce insecticide
rates to protect natural enemies |
52% |
|
- Growers rely heavily on programs of
field scouting and economic thresholds to determine the need for
pesticides (TABLE 4). But "high-tech" methods (infrared
photography, aerial monitoring, use of computers to make pest
control decisions) are used by fewer than 5% of onion growers.
|
- Over 90% of the commercial dry onion
acreage is checked at least once weekly during the growing season
for pest problems (FIGURE 1).
|
|
Table 4. Percentage of
growers using IPM practice on more
than half their commercial dry onion acreage on average
during the past 5 years.*
| CULTURAL CONTROLS |
%
growers |
| minimize bruising
during harvest |
97% |
| minimize bruising
during cultivation & weeding |
95% |
| destroy cull onions
& plant debris after harvest |
93% |
| cultivate for pest
control |
93% |
| control weeds in fencerows
& uncultivated areas |
93% |
| rotate out of onions |
87% |
| 2-year
rotation |
6% |
| 3-year
rotation |
17% |
| 4-year
or longer |
60% |
| control weeds that
are alternate hosts for onion pests |
65% |
| adjust fertility and
irrigation practices to manage pests |
60% |
| plant disease-resistant
onion varieties |
54% |
| alter planting &
harvesting dates to control pests |
37% |
| clean field equipment
to avoid introducing pests |
35% |
| rogue-out volunteer
onions in rotational crops |
27% |
| BIOLOGICAL CONTROLS |
|
| reduce insecticide
use to protect natural enemies |
29% |
| scout fields for beneficial
natural enemies |
15% |
| SCOUTING, THRESHOLDS
& PESTICIDES |
|
| scout fields for diseases,
insects and weeds to determine need for pesticides |
31% |
| inspect
plants for onion thrips |
100% |
| scout
previous crop for weed problems |
76% |
| sample
soil for nematodes |
31% |
| keep written records
of pesticide applications |
96% |
| adjust herbicide application
rate based on weed pressure |
89% |
rotate classes of
fungicides, herbicides & nematicides
to avoid pesticide resistance |
89% |
| apply pesticides only
if infestations exceed thresholds |
87% |
| consider risk of leaching
when selecting pesticides |
87% |
| keep written notes
or field maps about pest problems |
57% |
| spot-spray weed patches
vs entire field |
45% |
*NOT SHOWN: PRACTICES USED BY FEWER THAN 25% GROWERS |
|
|
Figure 1. Frequency onion
fields are checked
during the growing season for disease, insect,
nematode or weed problems (% growers)
[NOT SHOWN: "never check" = 0%, "check once or twice
during growing season" = 0%]
|
| PART 3B. IPM PRACTICES - pesticide
use patterns |
- Pesticides are an integral part of onion
production (TABLE 5). Essentially all commercial onion acreage
is treated with herbicides, fungicides and insecticides. The majority
of fields receive 2 or 3 applications each of herbicides, fungicides
and insecticides, generally applied as foliar sprays.
|
- Nearly 7 in 10 fields also are treated
with soil fumigants, while 1 in 3 fields are treated with a nematicide
(TABLE 5).
|
|
Table 5. Pesticide use
patterns reported by commercial onion producers.
Values are grower averages over the past 5 years.
| Pesticide class |
%
fields treated |
% fields
receiving
1 applications
per year |
% fields
receiving
2-3 applications
per year |
% fields
receiving 4 or more applications
per year |
| Herbicides |
100% |
10% |
47% |
43% |
Pre-emergence
(before weeds
emerge) |
83% |
78% |
20% |
2% |
Post-emergence
(after weeds
emerge) |
99% |
14% |
61% |
25% |
| Fungicides |
99% |
13% |
57% |
30% |
| Nematicides |
32% |
100% |
0% |
0% |
| Soil Fumigants |
69% |
99% |
0% |
1% |
| Insecticides |
100% |
8% |
62% |
30% |
| soil
insecticides |
89% |
95% |
3% |
2% |
| foliar
insecticides |
86% |
23% |
62% |
15% |
NOTE: data in columns 3, 4 and 5 (% fields
receiving 1, 2-3, or 4 or more applications yearly) are valid only
for fields treated (example: 83% of the fields were treated with
pre-emergence herbicides; of that 83% treated, 78% received 1 pre-emergence
application, 20% received 2-3 pre-emergence applications, and 2%
received 4 or more pre-emergence applications; by subtraction, 17%
of the fields never were treated with a post-emergence herbicide).
|
| PART 4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND
CONCLUDING (PRECAUTIONARY) NOTES ABOUT THESE DATA. |
- Survey sample size is relatively small,
but production system characteristics (PART 1) suggest
our sample population of growers is in fact representative of
regional onion production.
|
- Data here is growers subjective perceptions
of pest importance and not necessarily an objective measure of
actual economic impact; nonetheless, grower beliefs about pest
status and attitudes about pest control needs are critical if
we are to conduct research and extension programs that fit the
way farmers produce onions.
|
- Surveys suggest 3 priority pests
for future research emphasis: thrips, annual broadleaf
weeds and yellow nutsedge; more than half the growers surveyed
consider these as serious pest problems. Alternatives to insecticides
for thrips seems critically urgent. Thrips control currently depends
on repeated applications of foliar insecticides. Over 75% of growers
surveyed said they make at least 2 applications of foliar insecticides
to each onion field every year; 15% make 4 or more applications.
Intensive insecticide use pose a risk for pesticide resistance.
Further, the organophosphate and carbamate insecticides registered
for onion thrips control [diazinon, Guthion, Lannate, malathion,
Penncap-M, Vydate] may be subject to reduced uses as the Food
Quality Protection Act is implemented.
|
- Extension outreach is needed to help
onion growers make the best use of biological approaches to pest
control; adoption rates remain low throughout the region.
|
|