IPM>Surveys>

 
NEWS
INTEGRATED PEST
MANAGEMENT

National and Regional IPM

Biological Control

IPM Recommendations and Databases

IPM Newsletters

Idaho IPM Practices Surveys

Idaho IPM Statewide Reports

IR-4
PESTICIDE
SAFETY PROGRAM
SUSTAINABLE
AGRIULTURE
CROPS
WEATHER
HOMEOWNER
INFORMATION

  HOME
  CONTACT US
  FEEDBACK - tell us what you think
 


Integrated Pest Management and the Idaho/Eastern Oregon Onion Industry -- Results of Grower Surveys
Project BDK810
E. J. Bechinski
Extension IPM Coordinator
Division of Entomology
University of Idaho
Moscow, ID 83844
208/885-5972
mailto:ed_bechinski@uidaho.edu

INTRODUCTION
We assessed pest concerns and use of IPM practices within the onion industry by conducting a regional survey of commercial (non-seed) dry onion growers in southwest Idaho and eastern Oregon during winter 1997-1998. Our objectives were two-fold:
  1. to identify grower perceptions of key pest problems in onions;
  2. to measure use of pest control tactics by commercial onion producers, especially use of pesticides and their alternatives.
The survey was part of a continuing effort by the University of Idaho Extension IPM Program to document use of pest management methods by key agricultural industries.
Five University of Idaho faculty contributed to survey questionnaire design. The questionnaire was mailed during January 1998 to 402 persons on mailing lists provided by Lynn Jensen (OSU Malheur County Cooperative Extension) and Darrell Bolz (UI Canyon County Cooperative Extension). Follow-up postcard reminders were mailed to persons who did not return completed questionnaires with 2-3 weeks of the initial mailing. Persons who did not respond to the postcard reminder received a second copy of the questionnaire 4 weeks later. Results here summarize 102 completed, usable surveys.
PART 1. DEMOGRAPHICS OF SURVEY RESPONDENTS
  • The typical survey respondent farmed approximately 625 acres annually. Average yearly onion production was 50+ acres, virtually all of which was grown under furrow irrigation. On average, survey respondents were middle-aged, well-educated, and reported gross farm sales in the $250,000 to $500,000+ range during 1997. Respondents were evenly represented from Oregon and Idaho (TABLE 1).
  • To the extent these respondents represent the "typical" commercial onion grower, survey data here can be interpreted as a snapshot of regional onion production.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of onion growers participating in the
survey.

Annual Total Acres Farmed
   average    623 acres
   minimum    35 acres
   maximum    15,100 acres
Onion Acres Planted % growers
   less than 10 acres    0%
   10 to 25 acres    11%
   25 to 50 acres    26%
   more than 50 acres    63%
County of onion production % growers
   Ada    0%
   Canyon    23%
   Gem    0%
   Malheur    48%
   Owyhee    4%
   Washington    17%
   other counties    8%
Type of Irrigation % growers
   sprinkler    1%
   furrow    99%
Grower Age
   average rank    3.1

  
where 1=35 years old or younger
     2=35 to 45 years old
     3=46 to 55 years old
     4=56 to 65 years old
     5=over 65 years old
Grower Education
   average rank    3.8

  
where 1=less than high school
     2=high school graduate or GED
     3=post high school or vocational training
     4=some college
     5=college graduate
     6=graduate school
Grower Gross Farm Sales, 1997
   average rank    4.2

  
where 1=less than $49,999
     2=$50,000 to $99,999
     3=$100,000 to $249,000
     4=$250,000 to $499,999
     5=more than $500,000
*sample size = 402 survey questionnaires mailed, 102 growers responding (25.4% usable surveys)
PART 2. GROWER PERCEPTIONS OF ONION PEST PROBLEMS
  • Growers said that insects are their most important pest problem in dry onion production. More than half the respondents ranked insect pests as "serious" problems; no grower ranked insects as "not a problem" (TABLE 2).
  • Onion growers perceive diseases, nematodes and weeds as important but slightly less serious pests than insects (TABLE 2); more than 4 in 10 survey respondents ranked these as "serious" problems. A higher percentage (12%) said diseases and nematodes were "not a problem," compared to 2% who said weeds were "not a problem."
  • Nearly 9 in 10 onion producers said that rodents are not problems in dry onion production (TABLE 2). No grower said that rodents were serious problems.

Table 2. Pest concerns (% growers responding)

PEST "Not a
problem"
"Moderate
problem"
"Serious
problem"
"Unsure"
diseases & nematodes 12% 46% 43% 0%
weeds 2% 55% 43% 0%
insects 0% 45% 55% 0%
rodents 88% 11% 0% 1%
  • Growers reported their 3 most important pest problems were thrips, annual broadleaf weeds and yellow nutsedge (TABLE 3); more than half of survey respondents ranked these as "serious."

Table 3. Individual pest concerns
(% growers ranking pests as
"serious")

WEEDS
   annual broadleaves 55%
   yellow nutsedge 55%
   annual grasses 19%
   perennial broadleaves 19%
   herbicide-resistant weeds 5%
INSECTS
   thrips 69%
   wireworms 3%
   bulb mite 2%
   onion maggot 2%
DISEASES
   downy mildew 34%
   neck rot 33%
   storage rots 33%
   pink root 27%
   plate rot (butt rot) 20%
  • Growers generally perceive more individual diseases and weeds as serious problems than individual insects pests. Each disease on the survey questionnaire was ranked by at least 20% of growers as a "serious" problem; most weed problems similarly were ranked as serious by growers (TABLE 3).
  • Pests ranked as "not a problem" by a majority of onion growers were
    stubby root nematode 76%
    stem & bulb nematode 76%
    wireworms 73%
    bulb mite 61%
    onion maggot 55%
    herbicide resistant weeds 45%

    where values in parentheses are % growers scoring pest as "not a problem."

PART 3A. IPM PRACTICES -- alternatives to pesticides
  • Essentially all commercial dry onion growers practice certain elements of Integrated Pest Management. Multiple pest control tactics are the norm.
  • "Good farming" cultural practices are widely used to control onion pests (TABLE 4). Nine of 10 onion producers reduce buildup of diseases, nematodes, weeds and insects on more than half their onion acreage by rotating fields out of onions, by cultivating, by destroying cull onions and plant debris after harvest, and by minimizing bulb injury during weeding and harvest. Nearly 75% of growers follow a four-year rotation (onions every 4th year or longer) on at least half their acreage.
  • Use of biological controls is limited to modest adoption levels of field scouting for beneficial natural enemies and use of reduced insecticide application rates to reduce harm to beneficial biocontrol agents (TABLE 4). "Biologically-intensive" IPM methods with particularly low levels of use by growers are as follows: 
Biocontrol tactic

% growers who NEVER use tactic

     plant border crops as habitat for ladybeetles
& other beneficial natural enemies
97%
     mass-release natural enemies 93%
     scout fields for natural enemies 73%
     reduce insecticide rates to protect natural enemies 52%
  • Growers rely heavily on programs of field scouting and economic thresholds to determine the need for pesticides (TABLE 4). But "high-tech" methods (infrared photography, aerial monitoring, use of computers to make pest control decisions) are used by fewer than 5% of onion growers.
  • Over 90% of the commercial dry onion acreage is checked at least once weekly during the growing season for pest problems (FIGURE 1).

Table 4. Percentage of growers using IPM practice on more
than half their commercial dry onion acreage on average
during the past 5 years.*

CULTURAL CONTROLS % growers
minimize bruising during harvest 97%
minimize bruising during cultivation & weeding 95%
destroy cull onions & plant debris after harvest 93%
cultivate for pest control 93%
control weeds in fencerows & uncultivated areas 93%
rotate out of onions 87%
   2-year rotation 6%
   3-year rotation 17%
   4-year or longer 60%
control weeds that are alternate hosts for onion pests 65%
adjust fertility and irrigation practices to manage pests 60%
plant disease-resistant onion varieties 54%
alter planting & harvesting dates to control pests 37%
clean field equipment to avoid introducing pests 35%
rogue-out volunteer onions in rotational crops 27%
BIOLOGICAL CONTROLS
reduce insecticide use to protect natural enemies 29%
scout fields for beneficial natural enemies 15%
SCOUTING, THRESHOLDS & PESTICIDES
scout fields for diseases, insects and weeds to determine need for pesticides 31%
   inspect plants for onion thrips 100%
   scout previous crop for weed problems 76%
   sample soil for nematodes 31%
keep written records of pesticide applications 96%
adjust herbicide application rate based on weed pressure 89%
rotate classes of fungicides, herbicides & nematicides
to avoid pesticide resistance
89%
apply pesticides only if infestations exceed thresholds 87%
consider risk of leaching when selecting pesticides 87%
keep written notes or field maps about pest problems 57%
spot-spray weed patches vs entire field 45%

*NOT SHOWN: PRACTICES USED BY FEWER THAN 25% GROWERS

Figure 1. Frequency onion fields are checked
during the growing season for disease, insect,
nematode or weed problems (% growers)
[NOT SHOWN: "never check" = 0%, "check once or twice
during growing season" = 0%]

PART 3B. IPM PRACTICES - pesticide use patterns
  • Pesticides are an integral part of onion production (TABLE 5). Essentially all commercial onion acreage is treated with herbicides, fungicides and insecticides. The majority of fields receive 2 or 3 applications each of herbicides, fungicides and insecticides, generally applied as foliar sprays.
  • Nearly 7 in 10 fields also are treated with soil fumigants, while 1 in 3 fields are treated with a nematicide (TABLE 5).

Table 5. Pesticide use patterns reported by commercial onion producers.
Values are grower averages over the past 5 years.

Pesticide class %
fields treated
% fields
receiving
1 applications
per year
% fields
receiving
2-3 applications
per year
% fields
receiving 4 or more applications
per year
Herbicides 100% 10% 47% 43%
   Pre-emergence
   (before weeds
   emerge)
83% 78% 20% 2%
   Post-emergence
   (after weeds
   emerge)
99% 14% 61% 25%
Fungicides 99% 13% 57% 30%
Nematicides 32% 100% 0% 0%
Soil Fumigants 69% 99% 0% 1%
Insecticides 100% 8% 62% 30%
   soil insecticides 89% 95% 3% 2%
   foliar insecticides 86% 23% 62% 15%

NOTE: data in columns 3, 4 and 5 (% fields receiving 1, 2-3, or 4 or more applications yearly) are valid only for fields treated (example: 83% of the fields were treated with pre-emergence herbicides; of that 83% treated, 78% received 1 pre-emergence application, 20% received 2-3 pre-emergence applications, and 2% received 4 or more pre-emergence applications; by subtraction, 17% of the fields never were treated with a post-emergence herbicide).

PART 4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUDING (PRECAUTIONARY) NOTES ABOUT THESE DATA.
  • Survey sample size is relatively small, but production system characteristics (PART 1) suggest our sample population of growers is in fact representative of regional onion production.
  • Data here is growers subjective perceptions of pest importance and not necessarily an objective measure of actual economic impact; nonetheless, grower beliefs about pest status and attitudes about pest control needs are critical if we are to conduct research and extension programs that fit the way farmers produce onions.
  • Surveys suggest 3 priority pests for future research emphasis: thrips, annual broadleaf weeds and yellow nutsedge; more than half the growers surveyed consider these as serious pest problems. Alternatives to insecticides for thrips seems critically urgent. Thrips control currently depends on repeated applications of foliar insecticides. Over 75% of growers surveyed said they make at least 2 applications of foliar insecticides to each onion field every year; 15% make 4 or more applications. Intensive insecticide use pose a risk for pesticide resistance. Further, the organophosphate and carbamate insecticides registered for onion thrips control [diazinon, Guthion, Lannate, malathion, Penncap-M, Vydate] may be subject to reduced uses as the Food Quality Protection Act is implemented.
  • Extension outreach is needed to help onion growers make the best use of biological approaches to pest control; adoption rates remain low throughout the region.

 
Webmaster:
 lunger@uidaho.edu
 

All contents copyright © 1998-2001 College of Agriculture, University of Idaho. All rights reserved.