| Importance of
Wheat Pests in Idaho -- Results of Grower Surveys |
Project BDK810
E. J. Bechinski
Extension IPM Coordinator
Division of Entomology
University of Idaho
Moscow, ID 83844
208/885-5972
mailto:ed_bechinski@uidaho.edu |
|
| INTRODUCTION |
| We assessed pest
concerns within the Idaho wheat industry by conducting a statewide
survey of commercial wheat growers. Our objectives were two-fold:
(1) to understand growers perceptions of key pest problems; (2) to
determine grower attitudes about pest control tactics in wheat.
|
| We intended that
survey data help us refine research and extension programs to best
match priority needs identified by the Idaho wheat industry. This
survey is part of an overall effort by the University of Idaho Extension
IPM Program to document use of pest management methods by key agricultural
industries in Idaho. |
| Ten University of
Idaho faculty and industry specialists/experts contributed to survey
questionnaire design. Using mailing lists provided by Patricia Dailey,
we mailed the questionnaire to 1,000 randomly-selected people during
late November 1997. Sampling scheme was stratified random, with 200
questionnaires allocated to each of the 5 wheat production districts.
Follow-up postcard reminders were mailed to persons who did not return
completed questionnaires with 2-3 weeks of the initial mailing. Persons
who did not respond to the postcard reminder received a second copy
of the questionnaire 4 weeks later. |
| Results herein summarize
218 completed surveys. Table 1 gives the regional breakdown
of survey respondents. |
|
Table 1. Sample-size statistics
for Idaho wheat pest status survey.
WHEAT
PRODUCTION
REGION |
NO.
COMPLETED
SURVEYS |
%
TOTAL
SURVEYS |
| District 1 |
53 |
24% |
| District 2 |
50 |
23% |
| District 3 |
42 |
19% |
| District 4 |
33 |
15% |
| District 5 |
40 |
18% |
| TOTAL |
218 |
100% |
|
| PART 1. PRODUCTION
SYSTEM |
| Soft white winter
wheat was the predominant wheat class reported by survey respondents,
accounting for 43% of total wheat acres planted (Figure 1).
Soft white winter and soft white spring wheat together were nearly
75% of total wheat acres. Hard red spring wheat was the next predominant
production class. The remaining classes together accounted for about
10% total wheat production. |
|
Figure 1. Statewide wheat productionby class (%
total acres planted).
SWS= soft white spring
SWW = soft white winter
HRS = hard red spring
HRW= hard red winter
HWS = hard white spring |
|
- Wheat production characteristics differed
among the 5 reporting districts (Table 2). Site characteristics
in southwestern and south-central Idaho (District 3) were
more uniform (less variable) than in the other 4 districts; virtually
all reported District 3 production was soft white wheat,
evenly divided between winter and spring seedings, all grown under
irrigation. Production characteristics were more variable in the
remaining four districts. Dryland systems predominated in Districts
1, 3 and 5. Hard red spring and winter wheats together were
the major production class in District 5 (southeast Idaho).
|
| WHEAT CLASS |
DISTRICT
1 |
DISTRICT
2 |
DISTRICT
3 |
DISTRICT
4 |
DISTRICT
5 |
| soft white spring |
28% |
19% |
50% |
49% |
19% |
| soft white winter |
53% |
64% |
48% |
15% |
21% |
| hard red spring |
14% |
7% |
0% |
27% |
30% |
| hard red winter |
1% |
0% |
0% |
5% |
25% |
| hard white spring |
1% |
1% |
2% |
5% |
3% |
| durum wheat |
0% |
1% |
0% |
0% |
2% |
| club wheat |
3% |
6% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
| IRRIGATION
PRACTICES |
|
|
|
|
|
| irrigated |
2% |
37% |
100% |
90% |
40% |
| not irrigated |
98% |
63% |
0% |
10% |
60% |
| ANNUAL ACRES
FARMED |
|
|
|
|
|
| all crops |
1212 acres |
905 acres |
897 acres |
978 acres |
1584 acres |
soft white
spring wheat
(rank)* |
2.1 |
1.6 |
2.1 |
2.7 |
2.1 |
soft white
winter wheat
(rank)* |
3.2 |
2.9 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
| *NOTE: Numeric
ranks for wheat acres are 1 = no acres, 2 = up to 249 acres,
3 = 250 to 499 acres |
|
| PART 2. GROWER
PERCEPTIONS OF WHEAT PEST PROBLEMS |
- Growers ranked weeds as their most serious
pest problem in wheat (Table 3). Over 40% of producers
statewide scored weeds as a "serious" problem, while only 10%
said weeds were "not a problem."
|
- Diseases and insects comprised a less-serious
second-tier of pest problems (Table 3). Approximately 10%
of wheat producers rated these pests as "serious."
|
- The majority of wheat producers ranked
nematodes and rodents as non-problems, though there was a higher
degree of uncertainty about the importance of nematode problems
than for any other pest group (Table 3).
|
|
Table 3. Statewide pest
concern (% growers responding)
| PEST |
"Not a
problem" |
"Moderate
problem" |
"Serious
problem" |
"Unsure" |
| diseases |
41% |
46% |
10% |
3% |
| nematodes |
76% |
8% |
1% |
15% |
| weeds |
10% |
48% |
43% |
0% |
| insects |
37% |
48% |
13% |
2% |
| rodents |
65% |
26% |
4% |
4% |
|
- Individual pests considered "serious"
by more than 10% of growers statewide were as follows (Table
4): #1 quackgrass, #2 annual grasses, #3 perennial broadleaves,
#4 annual broadleaves, #5 aphids
|
|
Table 4. Statewide pest
concerns (% growers ranking pests as "serious")
| WEEDS |
|
|
|
quackgrass |
43% |
|
annual grasses |
40% |
|
perennial broadleaves |
38% |
|
annual broadleaves |
23% |
|
herbicide-resistant
weeds |
7% |
| INSECTS |
|
|
|
aphids |
10% |
|
Hessian fly |
4% |
|
cereal leaf beetle |
2% |
|
cutworms |
2% |
|
wireworms |
1% |
| DISEASES |
|
|
|
rusts |
8% |
|
Cephalosporium stripe |
6% |
|
root diseases |
6% |
|
strawbreaker foot
rot |
4% |
|
barley yellow dwarf |
3% |
|
common bunt |
2% |
|
wheat streak mosaic |
1% |
|
powdery mildew |
<1% |
|
black chaff |
<<1% |
|
- Perceived pest problems varied by production
region across Idaho (Table 5).
|
- District 1 producers (northern
Idaho) ranked disease, insect and weed problems as more serious
than overall state average survey values (Table 5). Figure
2 lists specific northern Idaho wheat pest problems that differed
by more than 10% from statewide average rankings.
|
- District 3 producers (SW and
SC Idaho) ranked their weed problems as less serious than statewide
average survey values (Table 5).
|
- District 3 was the only region
where rodents are considered a serious problem; 16% of growers
ranked rodents as "serious," four-fold the overall statewide average
survey value (Table 5).
|
- District 5 producers (SE Idaho)
ranked insect problems as more serious than overall statewide
average survey values (Table 5).
|
- Regional pest concerns in Districts
2 and 4 fell within statewide average survey norms.
|
Table
5. Regional pest concerns that differed by at least 10
percentage points from statewide average rankings. "District"
and "state" values are % growers who reported problem as
"serious." |
| DISTRICT |
PEST |
district ranking |
state ave. |
| 1 |
diseases |
27% |
10% |
| |
insects |
28% |
13% |
| |
weeds |
58% |
43% |
| 2 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
| 3 |
weeds |
28% |
43% |
| |
rodents |
16% |
4% |
| 4 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
| 5 |
Insects |
27% |
13% |
| NOTE:- --
indicates that district response differed by less than 10%
from state average response |
|
|
Figure 2. District
1 pest concerns that differed by at least 10% from statewide
average rankings. "District" and "state" values are
% growers who reported problem as "serious."
|
|
| PART 3A. GROWER
ATTITUDES ABOUT PEST CONTROL TACTICS |
- By a 6 to 1 statewide ratio, wheat producers
said they needed more pest control alternatives to traditional
chemical pesticides (Table 6). Interest is highest in pest-resistant
varieties and cultural methods of pest control.
|
- Although the majority of growers said
they needed more conventional pesticides for wheat pests (particularly
weeds), an even larger percentage of growers wanted least-toxic
biorational pesticides as well as pest scouting tools and decision
aids (Table 7) for wheat pest control.
|
| Table
6. Attitudes about alternatives to pesticides. Responses
are % growers who "agreed" or "disagreed" with the statement
"Wheat producers need more. . ." |
| "Wheat producers
need more. . ." |
agree |
disagree |
| Alternatives to pesticides |
63% |
10% |
|
esp. for diseases |
61% |
10% |
|
esp. for insects |
58% |
12% |
|
esp. for weeds |
68% |
14% |
|
esp. for nematodes |
34% |
8% |
| Pest-resistant varieties |
81% |
4% |
Cultural pest controls
(tillage & residue managment) |
80% |
6% |
| Long-term rotations
for pest control |
73% |
7% |
| Genetically-engineered
varieties |
66% |
5% |
| Biological controls |
57% |
7% |
|
| Table 7. Attitudes
about pesticides and related IPM tools. Responses are %
growers who "agreed" or "disagreed" with the statement "Wheat
producers need more. . ." |
| "Wheat
producers need more. . ." |
agree |
disagree |
| Conventional
chemical pesticides |
54% |
14% |
| esp. for diseases |
49% |
12% |
| esp. for insects |
50% |
13% |
| esp. for weeds |
63% |
14% |
| esp. for nematodes |
24% |
12% |
| "Least-toxic"
biorational pesticides |
75% |
8% |
| Pest scouting
& detection tools |
74% |
5% |
| Improved
application technology |
73% |
7% |
| Economic
thresholds |
65% |
5% |
| Pest forecasts |
60% |
10% |
Precision
ag tools for pest control
|
57% |
7% |
|
| PART 3B. GROWER
ATTITUDES ABOUT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS |
- Wheat growers preferred "high-touch"
educational outreach methods to "high-tech" methods (Table
8).
|
| Table
8. Attitudes about educational programming methods. Responses
are % growers who "agreed" or "disagreed" with the statement
"Wheat producers need more. . ." |
| "Wheat producers
need more. . ." |
agree |
disagree |
| Computer
software to help with pest control |
31% |
25% |
| Web pages
about wheat pest |
38% |
19% |
| On-farm
demonstrations about pest control |
69% |
9% |
| Hands-on
training sessions about wheat pests |
77% |
6% |
| Printed
production manuals & extension bulletins |
82% |
5% |
|
| PART 4. CONCLUDING
(PRECAUTIONARY) NOTES ABOUT THESE DATA |
- Survey sample size is relatively small,
particularly for data summarized by individual production districts;
however, production system characteristics (PART 1) suggest
our sample population of growers is in fact representative of
Idaho wheat producers.
|
- Data here is growers subjective perceptions
of pest importance and not necessarily an objective measure of
actual economic impact; nonetheless, grower beliefs about pest
status and attitudes about pest control needs are critical if
we are to conduct research and extension programs that fit the
way farmers produce wheat in Idaho.
|
|